The Hidden Cost of Work-Life Balance: A Q&A with Eva Buechel
While companies understand that work-life balance increases worker productivity, Buechel’s research shows that managers may penalize employees who unplug during off hours.
Research: How Wrongdoers Gain Loyalty from Strangers
Research: How Wrongdoers Gain Loyalty from Strangers
New research from Assistant Professor Zachariah Berry found people don’t need to know someone personally to give them their loyalty.
Published research from Assistant Professor Zachariah Berry demonstrates the power of loyalty can be called upon to support those accused of wrongdoing, even those outside one's immediate circle of friends.
[iStock Photo]
There are myriad examples of wrongdoers evading consequences for their wrongdoing within their organizations for months or even years. Sean “Diddy” Combs, Harvey Weinstein, and Larry Nassar are a few prime examples. How do these individuals manage to get away with their wrongdoing for such extended periods?
In a recent article, published in Organization Science, USC Marshall Assistant Professor of Management and Organization Zachariah Berry, along with coauthor Cornell University Assistant Professor of Management and Organizations Angus Hildreth, explored one way in which wrongdoers receive support from colleagues, even those they do not know personally: the network effect of loyalty-based obligations.
Researchers found that loyalty can be called upon to support those accused of wrongdoing, even when the person being called upon does not know the accused. Across 11 pre-registered studies, including 10 experiments and one field study, Berry and Hildreth demonstrated that loyalty-based obligations to a direct tie (i.e., someone with whom one has a loyal relationship) can extend beyond the direct tie. This loyalty can influence support for indirect ties, such as a friend of a friend, (i.e., people they do not know but are connected to via their direct tie) who have been accused of wrongdoing.
Why does this occur? The researchers found that one’s loyalty to the person making the request made salient their relational identity with the requestor, which highlighted the norms for why they should grant the request. Specifically, participants reported greater trust and value alignment with the requestor when loyal to them; they also had greater relational concerns with the requestor if they did not grant their request when loyal to them.
In their first study, the researchers recruited full-time employees across a variety of industries and asked them to think of two different colleagues (in random order): one colleague to whom they were loyal and one with whom they worked. For each colleague, participants provided information about their colleague and their relationship to them, and were then presented with a story involving this colleague. Participants imagined that their colleague approached them at work and asked them to support a close friend of theirs, who the participant imagined not having a relationship with, but who was accused of engaging in wrongdoing at work.
Loyalty can be called upon to support those accused of wrongdoing, even when the person being called upon does not know the accused.
— Zachariah Berry
Assistant Professor of Management and Organization
The researchers conducted several follow-up studies replicating the results and demonstrating that the effect holds across many types of wrongdoing (e.g., theft, sexual harassment, dishonesty, plagiarism), and even across different forms and degrees of evidence against the accused. This included multiple accusations against the accused and evidence that proved the accused was guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.
In a field experiment, they recruited fraternity brothers living on a college campus through confederates (i.e., a fraternity brother secretly working with the researchers to carry out the study). Each house that participated had one confederate employed by the researchers who utilized a cover story about their friend who was accused of misappropriating the finances of a club on campus.
The confederate, not a leader in the house but an established member, was selected to introduce variation in loyalty without the influence of authority. The confederate asked one brother at a time privately if they would sign their name on a petition to support their friend, who the brother did not know, and help ensure that their friend would not face disciplinary action or be expelled. They found that brothers who were loyal to the confederate were far more likely to sign their name on the petition compared to brothers who reported not being loyal to the confederate.
This work demonstrates one way in which wrongdoers can receive support from various people throughout their organization, even those with whom they do not share a relationship. The research regarding relational identity and loyalty uncover key insights into why a wrongdoer may get away with their wrongdoing for extended periods of times.
RELATED
The Hidden Cost of Work-Life Balance: A Q&A with Eva Buechel
While companies understand that work-life balance increases worker productivity, Buechel’s research shows that managers may penalize employees who unplug during off hours.
Interview: Michael Mische on NBC Los Angeles
Mische explains why gas prices may increases in 2026 following the closing of two California oil refineries.
Quoted: Peter Kim in Christian Science Monitor
With new tariff threats, Kim says other nations are looking beyond the U.S. market to sell their goods.
Quoted: Shon Hiatt in the Wall Street Journal
Hiatt explains that the possible Shell acquisition of BP is a vote for oil and well-timed because of BP’s undervalued stock.
Research: Zachariah Berry in Harvard Business Review
Berry and his co-authors explain that people will often pursue a career in which they no longer have passion for fear of the judgment of others.