Why Marshall
Leadership
Dean Geoffrey Garrett
Dean's Cabinet
Boards
Real-World Learning
Human Leadership
Tech Fluency
Global Opportunities
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Teaching + Innovation
Experiential Learning Center
Open Expression Statement
Programs
Undergraduate Programs
Admissions
Degrees
BS Business Administration (BUAD)
Business Emphases
BS Accounting (ACCT)
World Bachelor in Business (WBB)
BS Business of Cinematic Arts (BCA)
BS Artificial Intelligence for Business (BUAI)
Undergraduate Minors
Graduate Programs
MBA Programs
Full-Time MBA (FTMBA)
Executive MBA (EMBA)
Part-Time MBA (MBA.PM)
International MBA (IBEAR)
Online MBA (OMBA)
Specialized Masters
MS Business Administration (MSBUSAD)
MS Business Analytics (MSBA)
MS Entrepreneurship + Innovation (MSEI)
MS Finance (MSF)
MS Global Supply Chain Management (MSGSCM)
MS Marketing (MSMKT)
MS Social Entrepreneurship (MSSE)
Master of Business for Veterans (MBV)
Master of Management Studies (MMS)
Accounting Masters
Master of Accounting (MAcc)
Master of Business Taxation (MBT)
Master of Business Taxation for Working Professionals (MBT.WP)
PhD Program
Accounting
Data Sciences + Operations
Finance
Management + Organization
Marketing
Graduate Certificates
GC in Business Analytics
GC in Financial Analysis + Valuation
GC in Management Studies
GC in Marketing
GC in Optimization + Supply Chain Management
GC in Strategy + Management Consulting
GC in Sustainability + Business
GC in Technology Commercialization
GC in Library and Information Management – Online
Executive Education
Departments
Business Communication (BUCO)
Faculty
Data Sciences and Operations (DSO)
Finance + Business Economics (FBE)
Leventhal School of Accounting (ACCT)
Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies (BAEP)
Management and Organization (MOR)
Marketing (MKT)
Institutes + Centers
Randall R. Kendrick Global Supply Chain Institute
Peter Arkley Institute for Risk Management
VanEck Digital Assets Initiative
Institute for Outlier Research in Business
Lloyd Greif Center for Entrepreneurial Studies
Incubate USC
USC Marshall Venture Fund
Brittingham Social Enterprise Lab
Neely Center for Ethical Leadership and Decision Making
Center for Effective Organizations
Center for Global Innovation
Center for Investment Studies
Initiative on Digital Competition
Trojan Network
Recruiting
Undergraduate
Graduate
Career Services
Giving + Support
Alumni Engagement + Resources
Student Organizations
Nandini Rajagopalan is the Joseph A. DeBell Chair in Business Administration and Professor of Management and Organization. Her research examines platform-based markets, diversification and strategic alliances, CEO succession, and corporate governance. She has published in the Academy of Management Review, the Academy of Management Journal, the Strategic Management Journal, the Journal of International Business Studies, the Journal of Management Studies, the Journal of Management, and Business Horizons among others. She is a Distinguished Faculty Fellow at USC’s Center for Excellence in Teaching, and recipient of USC’s Provost’s Mentoring Award. She is past Associate Editor of the Academy of Management Journal.
Areas of Expertise
NEWS + EVENTS
Global Collaborations
USC Marshall and India’s SP Jain Institute of Management and Research sign Memo of Understanding to exchange students, ideas, in global supply chain.
RESEARCH + PUBLICATIONS
Competition at the platform-level coevolve with that at the complementor level—while complementors’ cross-platform mobility affects platform level success, the uncertainty surrounding the emergence of dominant platform also affects complementors’ mobility decisions. In this study, we investigate the impact of the installed bases between Android and iOS on mobile developers’ decisions to move across platforms. We argue that Apple’s iOS pursued a more quality-driven strategy, and thus as Android catches up with iOS in terms of growing installed bases (of both hardware and software), there are uncertainties regarding which of the two will become the dominant platform. As the market evolves, however, it becomes clear that iOS can sustain its competitive advantages despite the smaller market share. We find the increasing gap between installed bases of Android and iOS has an inverted-U effect on iOS developers’ likelihood of moving to Android. Moreover, low performers and younger app-developers on iOS are more sensitive to such uncertainties and thus have been the primary contributors to the inverted-U shaped mobility pattern. In contrast, mobility from the Android to the iOS market does not show the same or a directly opposite pattern. Superior performance is more important for developers moving from Android to iOS (than the other direction of developers moving from iOS to Android). This is because mobility from the quantity-driven platform (Android) to the quality-driven one (iOS) is mainly motivated by the desire to target at a more lucrative, though more demanding, platform market, thus needs to be facilitated by higher performance.
We study the impact of acquisitions on subsequent market entries by complementors and their product performance in a platform-based market. While acquisitions signal market growth potential, they can also intensify market competition if large firms leverage network effects and become more competitive through such acquisitions. In an empirical study of 966 acquisitions on category entries of 281,771 app developers in the iOS mobile platform from 2008 to 2015, we find that acquisition intensity in a product category increases market entries, but that inexperienced developers make most entries. In contrast, experienced developers are less likely to enter product categories with intense acquisitions. In addition, products that are released at the same time as intense acquisitions in the focal category fare worse, experiencing shorter lifespans and a greater likelihood of failure. This negative effect is then amplified in categories with stronger network effects. Our paper contributes to the literature on platform-based markets by showing that acquisitions amplify network effects, which in turn intensify market competition. We also demonstrate the usefulness of the behavioral theory in explaining complementors’ strategic decision-making when facing market uncertainties.